Caves,Kate

 I'm pretty much “game” for all arguments. Successful debaters resolve competing arguments in their favor. My role is to decide if you did that more successfully than your opponent did. I can only do that if I can understand your argument. To be successful at this, you MUST warrant your arguments and extend your warrants.( “ Extend Khalizad moving on” is not sufficient.)

A few notes:

 1.When it comes to T- If you’re neg, tell me why the aff’s interpretation prevents you from having a fair shot at winning. It's not enough to tell me that the world for the neg would be slightly better if every aff team adopted your interpretation.  2.When it comes to the K- If there’s an alt, aff needs to answer it, or aff will lose because utopia is always better than the plan.  3.I flow as much as I can, thus I do my best not to read cards at the end of a round.  4. Cross-X is a very valuable tool. Use it in a valuable manner and I'll give you more speaker points.  5. Theory is not my strong suite so if your going to go for it, do a good job.   I know most of you work extremely hard at this sport. I respect that. Try to have fun!