Mueller,+Austin

Mueller, Austin School Affiliation: Foothill HS (NV), UNLV (NV) Rounds judged on the topic: 15+ Number of years of policy experience: 5

I would consider myself to be as tab as they come. I will vote on anything you say as long as its justified.
 * NDCA/TOC 2009 Philosophy**

Run them. I think competing interps are good. Potential abuse is probably not a voter. If you K the T though, you need to explain it well. I wont reject that argument but i do have a higher threshold for it.
 * Procedurals/T**

Run any Cp you like and a many as you like. (IF YOU HYPOTEST YOU BETTER JUSTIFY IT WELL) it just comes down to a theory level. I will vote on theory and any theory you wanna say as long as its explained well. I also eir aff on multiple conditional worlds bad. That doesnt mean dont run them, but again have a defense ready. Explain Theory like a disad, show the direction of abuse, and impact it. Not like what youll do if you lose but rather what the abuse has done to the debate.
 * CP's**

I am very familar with a plethora of krtikal literature but that doesnt mean ill assume to know what youre saying. I also tend to be vey old school with the K. Give it a framework and show why the stuff you talk about is more important. Without an alternate framework to evaluate the impacts, plan or alternative i will default as a rational policy maker. I ran the K inhigh school and run it in college, will vote on any number of strategies as long as explained.
 * The K**

I think there a great idea. explain impact calcs and we'll be ok.
 * DA's**

Dont be lazy. Dont run some weird ag because it sounds cool... even though i definatley enjoy the performance aspect of debate. Explain what it is my ballot does and the argument and ill vote on anything.
 * Performance**

Like big stick aff's. Like little stick affs with built in defense and K adv's. I dont care, its your debate im just here to decide who did a better job.
 * Aff case Structure**

Speaker points im pretty liberal with speaks and i tend to sty in the 27 range for and average debate. If you get lower than a 26 its because a) you said something really bad. b) you debated like billiy madison or c) you cheated.