Lyons,+Elyse

I don't have a problem with speed, but if I can't understand I won't flow it (obviously) and won't give you the benefit of the doubt, in later speeches, that you said it. I think theory should have a legitimate purpose (I won't intervene and ignore a theory argument just because I think it's stupid but I'm persuaded by well-warranted "I'm not being abusive" argument against silly theory) I have pretty high standards for warrants for a prioris (off case, etc.) there has to be a CLEAR reason it comes before the standard articulated in ALL speeches for me to vote on it, otherwise I default to the criterion. I won't vote on presumption for either side unles the debater explains why I should.