Hammock,+James

James Hammock High School: New Caney High School High School Debate Experience: 3 Years CX Debate College: University of Houston, Bauer Business Current Debate Team: Rounds judged this year: 0 Years Judging: 2 Current Job: Student Other info: I will consider any case viable so long as it is actually presented fairly, but spreading makes hearing your case difficult.

Paradigm - On a scale of 1 (Traditional) and 11 (Kritikal) - 3 Favorite Debate Argument: Stock issues Least Favorite Argument: Kritiks, but they can be done well. Won't vote on: I will not vote against a team just for running a kritik. Other broad preferences: Clear, understandable speech.

Specifics - Likely to vote on (1 is low, 5 is high) Topicality 4 Theory 3 Disads 5 Counterplans 4 Kritiks 2

A good debate about Topicality The ability for teams to properly clash over topicality, instead of dismissing the other team over it. A good debate about Theory:

A good debate about disads: Stressing the disads will no doubt catch my attention, and specific disads always make a good debate and prove the neg is well prepared. A good debate about counterplans: Proving that, without a doubt, your plan is better than the original. A good debate about Kritiks: Being able to argue something OTHER than kritiks alongside, kritiks can only enhance.

Other specific argument prefences:

Other Things: Speed: 2 Their flow: 4 Comments on flowing/speed: Clear presentation of your argument is paramount.

Gives good speaker points (1 is low, 10 is high) - Self rated- 10 Factors for speaker points: You will not be penalized for an errant stutter or pause, just make sure you know what you're talking about or slow down until you sound like you do.

Other: