Kalasky,+Leslie

Here are the criteria I use to judge the round.

1. __Burden of proof__: Which debater has proven his/her side of the resolution more valid as a general principle? I don't focus too much on insignificant dropped arguments.

2. __Value Structure__: Which debater better established a clear relationship between the argumentation and the value structure?
 * If the value is same for both sides, which case ultimately came across as the most just?
 * If the values are different, which value applies better to the resolution after listening to the arguments? Which debater convinced me that he/she best supports his/her value?

3. __Argumentation__: Which debater better presented his/her arguments with logical reasoning using appropriate support?

4. __Clash__: Which debater best showed the ability to both attack his/her opponent's case and to defend his/her own?