Wu,+Nicholas


 * Summary:**
 * Former Public Forum debater
 * Talking fast = fine; spreading with good signposting/numbering = okay; spreading with no signposting = no
 * Try to avoid Ks
 * Prefer substantive debate over theory
 * Give voters & Impact calc
 * Ask me any specific questions before the round starts


 * Debate Experience:**
 * Three years in Public Forum
 * 5th at Nationals
 * State semis
 * Two years in slow Policy
 * Public Forum was my main focus, therefore I know SOME jargon, but not all of it.


 * Speed:**
 * Talking quickly is fine
 * Spreading while signposting and numbering well is okay
 * Spreading without signposting or numbering will make me unable to flow half the stuff where you want me to
 * If you're spreading too quickly, then I will say "Clear" or "Slow" as many as times as necessary.
 * If you're making analytics, then you should probably slow down; spreading through cards at lightning speed is fine.


 * Kritik:**
 * Probably won't vote for you straight off of one, as I don't really care for them at all
 * Please provide an alternative or else I'll have no idea what happens when I vote for the K


 * Theory:**
 * If someone runs an abusive case or does something abusive and is NOT called out on it, then major props and I'll turn a blind eye.
 * If you run theory and it is valid, then I'll like you a lot more, but it won't necessarily win you the round
 * Impact theory with out-round implications or explain why I should look to theory before substance.


 * Voting Issues:**
 * First I look at the framework/weighing mechanism.
 * Second is each side's voters.
 * Finally I weigh appropriately.
 * If any of the aforementioned are missing, then I will have to intervene and when I intervene, I will not be weighing/voting the way you want me to