Skimmyhorn,+Bill

Bill Skimmyhorn United States Military Academy William.Skimmyhorn@usma.edu
 * Background**

I am one of the Assistant Coaches for the Army Debate Team. By trade, I am an Army Officer and an Economics Instructor in the Department of Social Sciences. Last year I was the Director of Forensics at Saint Francis HS in Mountain View, CA. I debated for 3 years in HS (1990-1993) and for 4 years in CEDA at USMA (1993-1997). I'm excited about reengaging with forensics at the collegiate level.

By default, I tend to be a policy-maker. Having said that, I try to let the debaters decide what's important. Framework arguments seem relevant in nearly all of today's debates, especially if critical arguments are presented by either team. I appreciate viable alternatives (in the policy or critical realms) and clear explanations and scenario development. Theory is fine too but I encourage thorough explanations and commitment in the final rebuttals.
 * Philosophy**

Speed is fine but the issue is typically clarity. Don't feel you have to spread to win. I find that most teams would do better cutting the number of responses they make by 1/3 or so and increasing their thinking and analysis. If I had to choose, I prefer depth to breadth (though I realize a balance between the two is typically the best Neg strategy). If you're unclear, I'll say, "clear," but only twice. After that you'll see that I stop flowing and it's up to you to adjust.

I hope our round together will be an enjoyable one. To that end, manners and ethics are very important to me and will be incorporated in assigning speaker points. I find the best debaters can balance their desire to win with healthy amounts of humor and humility. Given the work involved in this activity, I do hope that you enjoy your competitions.

I'll disclose after I make my decision. I do so with the understanding that a debate with the debaters will not ensue.

If you have any specific questions, feel free to ask.

Best wishes on a successful tournament and season.