Choi,+Morgan

__Background __ Grady High School, 2016 Tufts, 2020

 __General:__ - I'm down for any style of debate, as long as its well explained. - Smart analytics can almost always beat a bad card. - Link debates are a more important component than impact debates. - Having framing issues is a big plus for evaluating the round. - I'm pretty even on theory. - Don't be offensive / treat debaters with respect.

__Framework__ - It can be a viable strategy (doesn't mean it should be your sole strategy though). - I don't lean any way.

__Topicality__ - Author quals / intent is a really big way I evaluate evidence when it comes to this.

__Disads__ - they're fine, do what you want.

__Impact Turns__ - a lot of fun. (A 1NC of just impact turns would be awesome)

__Critiques__ - Do whatever - Please don't have a 3+ minute overview, if you do, at least throw in some jokes / humor

__Counterplans__ - They're fine - Specific PICs would be great

__Theory__ - 1 Condo is fine, 2 is questionable - Perf con can be a legit voting issue - //Really// generic process CPs are probably abusive

