Moriarty,+Caroline

Random-- -freshman at the University of Missouri - Kansas City -I debated for three years at Roosevelt High School in Sioux Falls, SD, and I qualified to NSDA Nationals in Policy and Congress -I'm always looking to learn new things -Don’t be a jerk in round-- I have low tolerance for rude behavior, especially when the other team looks uncomfortable -I’ll call for cards/want to be on email chain -I have experience with stock issues and k debate and respect both styles -debate your best-- I don’t want to prevent anyone from doing what they want to do CPs-- I didn’t run a lot of CPs in high school, so I'm less familiar with the mechanisms, but they're great when well-explained. T-- I think the general problem with T debates for me is that they get bogged down in standards v standards and other minutia-- if the T debate is fleshed out to where clash can determine the winner and loser, then I'm cool with it If you’re going for T, GO FOR IT-- 5 minutes in the 2nr, the abuse should be there and nothing else in the round should matter K-- I ran Ks on aff and neg, mostly fem and psychoanalysis, and I think K debate is interesting One caveat, I’m not familiar with lots of Ks, meaning you’ll have to explain the story and how it interacts with the affirmative/resolution <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Framework-- <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">I feel like the approach to framework should be less “fairness/limits” in their conventional sense and more “let’s make policy in policy debate.” <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">I probably default to a “how do I make the debate space better” mindset <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">DA-- <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Sell me on the link story-- I have a tendency to think link cards are pretty bad (see evidence quality standard at the top) <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Case-- <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Extensions of warrants are really important-- I definitely do not understand all plan mechanisms after the 1AC <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Theory-- <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">In round impacts are important, sell me on why it’s important to vote on them <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Slow down and flesh out the argument <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Any other things-- just ask, I will answer all questions to the best of my knowledge :)