Morrow,+Kentucky

Meta
Debate is a chessboard and nothing is set in stone except the pieces you give yourself

Kritiks
I am not a fan. I expect a lot of explanation and find buzzwords unpersuasive. You can win the game of debate on them though…but not on a 1AR drop. Also the capitalism bad critique is not a coherent argument.

Theory
Conditionality – neg I don’t see why you limit yourself at two, once you go past one go all the way Aff – most neg teams are bad at conditionality go for it, just don’t be stupid and go for 2AC time “skew”

Case
==== I put this last only because many of you are too lazy to actually cut a caseneg and probably will just read impact defense. Why do neg teams limit themselves to only impact defense? Please cut casenegs and beat the aff on their own turf. Your speaks will be rewarded and I will be happier. ====

I will time your cards and ask for speech docs if I think you are clipping.
If I seem disinterested don’t worry I am still listening