Drozda,+Zarek

**General:** I debated for four years on nat circuit at Harker, and ran mostly util/policy-style positions, so adapt to your judge. That being said, I'm open to any sort of argument, but here are my defaults:

**Theory:** - If your A strat is to run a bunch of theory spikes/presumption triggers every round and do no topic prep, don't pref me :D I will not vote on frivolous theory. - I'll still listen to any shell you read, especially if there is legit abuse in the round. Well-executed plans good/plans bad, or reject alts bad/good, etc. are fine. - I default to competing interpretations and drop the argument, but I'll vote on whatever is decided in the debate. - RVIs are fine.

**Fmwk/Philosophy:** - Make sure you explain how you (and your opponent) can weigh under your standard clearly - Just because you win framework or ROB doesn't mean you win the round - weigh your links - I'm not very compelled by skep - its probably defense

**Kritiks:** - Run them - I think they're the most educational part of debate, but if you read a rather uncommon K (i.e. something other than Cap, Fem, Racism, Anthro, etc.) make sure you explain them in english and not esoteric philosophical terms.

**Most importantly**, have fun! Debate is about learning and having fun while learning, not just trophies :D