Toth,+Mira


 * Policy Debate Overview--Judging for Bronx Science at the 2017 Mamaroneck Fall Face Off **

I am new to judging policy but have experience judging other forms of debate. Make every argument clear and tell me why it is **important ****!** Why should I vote for you?

Add me to the email chain if there is one/ If you’re using flash, flash me your files. Email: myrantoth@gmail.com

No spreading. I do not have a problem with it on principle. I just will not be able to follow your argument. Please be clear in your articulation. Don’t use a ton of debate jargon/buzzwords- explain what you’re trying to say in your own words and make it clear. This goes for both policy and critical oriented debaters.


 * Argument-Specific **(I prefer policy oriented traditional arguments)

//**Critical affs-**// very unfamiliar. Run them if you have NOTHING else, but be sure you explain yourself VERY clearly.

//**Neg arguments: **// //Disad//- Explain the story/scenario of how the aff causes a specific impact and why that impact is the most important. I prefer you use traditional impact calculus in your framing. //Counterplan//- Provide a competitive counterplan and explain the NET BENEFITS of why the counterplan is better than the aff //Topicality//- Prove the aff is untopical and tell me why it’s important //Kritik//- Unfamiliar- explain every argument clearly. I strongly advise you not to run one. If you chose to run a K, narrow the argument down to the impacts of the K.