Chen,+Amber

Theory: Okay Counterplans: Awesome Disads: Awesome Kritiks: Alright Framework: Alright Speed/Spreading: Alright ||
 * Which events do you typically judge? || Policy ||
 * What is your competitive speech or debate experience? || 4 years ||
 * High School || Kinkaid ||
 * College || University of Pennsylvania ||
 * Where have you coached? ||  ||
 * Approximately how many rounds have you judged this season? || 1 ||
 * How many years have you been judging? || 1 ||
 * I would prefer to listen to debates that were about these types of arguments: || No preference, I listen to all types of arguments, as long as they are articulated logically and clearly. I have less of a background with kritiks, but that doesn't mean I won't understand them/won't vote on them! ||
 * I give good speaker points to debaters that: || Keep a clean flow, explain and defend their evidence, effectively use cross ex time, and are able to present a speech smoothly and articulately ||
 * I would give low speaker points to a debater that: || Does not know their evidence well, jumps all over the flow, is unclear/incomprehensible ||
 * My favorite argument when I was debating was: || politics! ||
 * I won't vote on these types of arguments: || n/a ||
 * Rate the following argument types || Topicality: Alright
 * Explain your ratings, if you like || If you're going for a procedural (like theory or topicality), please make sure it's actually very relevant and not just a cheap shot out. When argued well, topicality debate can be great! Theory is harder.. As for counterplans and disads, love em. ||
 * Comments on flowing or speed: || You can spread as fast as you would like as long as you are CLEAR, which is super important! ||
 * Other things a team should know about? || I haven't judged any rounds on this topic before, so I don't know a lot of the acronyms that y'all may be familiar with, so as long as you explain them, you should be fine! ||