Bissell-Siders,+Aidan


 * Education:** [1] High School: Loyola Blakefield, MD 2016 [2] College: University of Maryland College Park 2020


 * Conflicts:** [1] Dallastown [2] Loyola Blakefield


 * Background:** I debated 1 year PF and 3 years LD.


 * Voting:** I vote on the flow + argument clash. If you want me to know that something is bullshit, say so.


 * Preferences:** Run anything. I only ask for three things:
 * **Nice:** Don't emotionally or physically harm anyone in the room.
 * **Real:** No frivolous or malicious theory/spikes/etc. //Please//. I'll flow it and I'll judge it but I'll hate it. (If the goal is to win on the theory instead of the substance, I hate it.)
 * **Fair:** The debate is fair & interesting. That's a bit nebulous; it boils down to the idea that debaters who go to camp shouldn't autobeat debaters who didn't, //just// because they didn't go to camp. **Example of an unfair & uninteresting debate:** debater A runs traditional, debater B runs a K, debater B argues that they operate at a higher level and so they win; done. **Example of a fair & interesting debate:** debater A runs traditional, debater B runs a K, debater B argues that they operate at a higher level AND that debater A's moral framework is insufficient AND that debater A's impacts don't matter / flow to B / etc. AND so they win.

Debates types I enjoy the most: good util > good FW = good post-fiat K > good pre-fiat K > good performance > good theory