Hernandez,+Vanessa

I've done CX in HS and I compete in circuit parli at Cal. I don't like to intervene so tell me what I should vote on and how each sheet interacts with other sheets in the round (i.e. if you're running a kritik with the same impacts as the case at least tell me why the kritik comes first and o/w, etc.). There is one exception to that rule, I'll never vote for potential abuse. Impact calc and thorough analysis at the end of the round is really important. I like theory, but I also love a great CP with a substantial net benefit. T is something I've voted on in the past, I don't generally think it is a reason for an RVI so just save it for another page. Keep the round clean and I'll generally give good speaks (usually 27-29). If you're going fast please be clear. One of my biggest pet peeves is mumbling in debate rounds, the second is being super rude without having a reason to be. Debate is fun and about learning, don't ruin your opportunity or your opponent's opportunity to learn something and have a good time.

Give me real clash and know that I won't c/a or extend arguments for you, you have to do the work yourself.

I don't like performance debate, be it on the aff or with a ridiculous alternative. I'll buy framework over performance.

If you have any questions I'll be happy to answer them for you at the beginning of the round.

Finally, my last name is Fernandez. Error of sorts.