Pregasem,+Angela


 * As of Harvard Invitational, __2012__: **

This is my first year judging LD. Thus, I prefer a conversational pace. I will say **SLOWER** if you are going too fast but don’t rely on it because it may affect your speaks.

I will judge the round in how you explain to me your positions and how it interacts with the resolution. I prefer you use the normal value/VC structure because I am most familiar with that. This also means I prefer more topical positions.

When it comes to kritikal arguments, please don’t run them. I do not have any experience in such philosophy and thus won’t understand it probably. Further, don’t run too complicated positions unless you can explain them with ease.


 * Don’t run theory **, however, if your opponent is being abusive, explain to me how we should evaluate the round instead, not how I should punish them.

I average around 27/27.5 speaks and will __reward__ you for a strong performance.

Most Important: **Give me voting issues.** That’s the only I can make a clear decision. I don't want a muddled debate.

Further, I will __dock__ speaks for any new arguments in the 2AR.