Dolge,+Luke

Years competed in HS Policy: 2 Years Judged and Coached: 8

Policy Maker.

Kritiks: I have an extremely high kritik threshold. If the kritik can uniquely link to the affirmative, and show a measurable growth of harms in the SQ as a result of the plan, I might be inclined to listen to the kritik if you can explain how the alternative works.

Topicality: I lean towards reasonability, negs should be able to prove abuse for a ballot.

Good rounds in my view would include:

Strong impact calculus on both sides. A clear negative strategy. A 1AC that is present after the 1AC. Both sides analyzing the warrants of important cards in the round. Consistent structure and clash.