Rodriguez,+Mario

Theory: Alright Counterplans: Don't care Disads: Awesome Kritiks: Awesome Framework: Awesome Speed/Spreading: Alright || Debater want nice judge. ||
 * Which events do you typically judge? || Lincoln Douglas ||
 * What is your competitive speech or debate experience? || Lincoln Douglas, FX ||
 * High School || George Ranch ||
 * College || University of Houston ||
 * Where have you coached? ||  ||
 * Approximately how many rounds have you judged this season? || 4 ||
 * How many years have you been judging? || 1 ||
 * I would prefer to listen to debates that were about these types of arguments: || Framework and impact calculus ||
 * I give good speaker points to debaters that: || Are fluent and professional. ||
 * I would give low speaker points to a debater that: || Stutter a lot, breath deeply every other word, and is rude or condescending. ||
 * My favorite argument when I was debating was: || The Categorical Imperative ||
 * I won't vote on these types of arguments: || Presumption ||
 * Rate the following argument types || Topicality: Don't care
 * Explain your ratings, if you like || The timing in LD doesn't allow for great topicality debates (also the framework structure kind of makes it unnecessary in my opinion). Kritik and framework arguments are great. Disads are expected in some format, and counter plans are 'meh'. ||
 * Comments on flowing or speed: || If you spread, don't stutter a lot. It's annoying and hard to flow. ||
 * Other things a team should know about? || Fun debates make judge happy. Happy judge nice to debater.