Smith,+Jacob

Policy Experience 2 Years debating at Sachse Highschool (Local ) 2 Years debating Jenks ( National circuit ) - Qualified to the TOC my senior year Freshman debating at OU

General - Don't tell me to call for like 30 cards after the round, pick and choose which one you think will win you the round - Don't be hostile - Don't say racist, sexist , ableist , homophobic and other bad things - Impact framing is important

T - Great, Went for it alot of my 2nr's during my senior year. -Tell me what you mean by reasonability because it could mean a ton of things -Impact out things beyond just assertions

FW - Contrary to my argument choices, i'm probably more neutral on this argument than one would expect. neg side - Don't just assert a T-version of the aff without A) Explaining how it solves the aff B) Making sure it meets your own definition of the resolution - Read a definition of the Verb of the topic please. - I'm way more persuaded on the Limits/Predictability side of FW compared to the state good/civic engagement debate. If you do choose to read the latter, make sure to explain why its a competitive argument to vote neg for and not just a non competitive cp. -Less cards and more explanation is usually good Aff side -Make actual arguments... Antonio 95 and Fernando does not make a sufficient 2ac block to FW (I know this from experience) - Use your 1ac as offense against FW and the way they view the world - 2ac should be answering particular impact modules on FW instead of just reading your same 2ac block - If you're going for just a few args, make sure to explain how those particular args mean i don't evaluate the other teams args - Impact things out - Push on Thresholds/UQ of their impacts - don't be afraid to call T-version of Affs on not meeting their own interpretation

K - The Other thing most of my 2nr's in highschool were on. Neg Side - Actually impact out your links to answer things like the permutation - Contextualize link arguments to the aff - I have experience with most high theory K's (Esp Baudrillard, Heidegger ,Derrida, Deleuze and Nietzsche) and a good amount of experience going for colonialism based arguments , but that does not mean i will translate your jargon into arguments. - Having a case debate usually makes these alot easier to win in the 2nr

Aff side - Question alt solvency - Make a smarter arg than no K's allowed - Do more than just impact turn the K. Tho don't be afraid to go for 6 minutes of that impact turn

K affs - Always have Da's to the alt, go for more than just link turns and the perm

DA's - I've gone for them, explain impact framing and turns case arguments.

CP - They're fine I'm generally neutral on most theory arguments i will vote on condo bad if the aff wins it